A couple of years ago, I bought my 'second' first original vintage Ken. I say 'second first' because this is my second original Ken, but my first that I can dress and play with. On the first of this year, I found my 'first' first Ken at the thrift store, but he came in an outfit that was sewn on, and I love the outfit and am not going to remove it. I think it's a colonial-era style of outfit. So while he's my first original Ken, I didn't have one that I could 'play' with. I have that one put away for the time being until I can properly display him. I bought one from ebay a couple of years ago that I liked, and he is my first Ken that I am able to do things with. I bought him with a few outfits, and he has been my first foray into vintage Ken. I hadn't encountered many Ken clothing items, and was thrilled with their quality. "His tiny clothes are so perfect!", was my first reaction. Absolutely nothing like the quality of Ken clothes (and all doll clothes in general) that Mattel puts out today, even in the collector dolls. His flocked hair has some spots missing, but that is fixable and no issue to me. I didn't want an expensive Ken doll that I could potentially ruin by accident. I have that kind of luck!
Here are his photos from before he came to me:
I do have other vintage Ken dolls, but they are not the first ones to have come out, they are from later years with molded hair, instead of flocked. I like the original Ken. I don't know why Mattel won't reproduce him, they flood the market with loads of other reproductions. If it's because they don't want to do flocking, they could release him with just the painted hair. Who knows why they do what they do.
Thursday, January 31, 2019
Friday, January 18, 2019
Coming Soon vs. Not Coming Soon
March will mark 60 years of Barbie, and they are releasing some ugly celebratory dolls. They won't be releasing the light pink doll, that is unavailable to the market. The fuschia Barbie has some perks, but the continuation of the napkin dress dolls wearing white are a huge let-down.
The faces are cute, the non-caucasian one looks like Ariana Grande, but they have got to stop making this stupid napkin dress, it looks like a bored waitress has been designing these dresses for the last ten years. On the job, with satin napkins to fold and tie to Barbie, they're tired and dull looking, enough is enough.
I hate to continue to complain about Mattel, but they inspire such unhappiness in me of the brand. If they continue as they have, they won't make it to 70.
Here's the odd fuschia and the lovely light pink.
The faces are cute, the non-caucasian one looks like Ariana Grande, but they have got to stop making this stupid napkin dress, it looks like a bored waitress has been designing these dresses for the last ten years. On the job, with satin napkins to fold and tie to Barbie, they're tired and dull looking, enough is enough.
I hate to continue to complain about Mattel, but they inspire such unhappiness in me of the brand. If they continue as they have, they won't make it to 70.
Here's the odd fuschia and the lovely light pink.
Friday, November 2, 2018
Ken Fashionistas Hyped Stripes Doll, Slim Body, and Mira Shards - Dragon Games theme
I have bought a lot of dolls in this past week. I bought several Ken Fashionistas first. I don't normally buy as many dolls all at once, but it seems that these kens are being phased out, at least locally, and some are harder to find at stores. So I bought the rest of the ones that I wanted before they were not in stores and only available at higher prices online, on ebay, etc. I did have to order one already via amazon, at 1.5x the price I would have paid at somewhere like Walmart, where they sell (here where I live) for 7.94. I paid 12.10 for him. He's the one I wanted most. He is Ken Fashionistas Hyped Stripes Doll, with the Slim build. I will show him first. I have not yet taken any photos of him or any other recent dolls just yet, so just stock photos for now.
I love his shoes, I did not see them until I received him today. I tend to not look at dolls online for very long because I typically like but do not buy them, as there are others higher on my list. I usually only buy one or two dolls a month, I do my best to limit myself. At the rate I buy dolls, many of those that I like but choose my monthly one or two over get pushed back down on the list, due to my liking another doll more at the time, and sometimes are not available in the stores by the time they reach the top of my list again. This is what happened with Ken Fashionistas Hyped Stripes. I did not check all of the stores in my city before buying him, just 3 or 4, but I felt paying an extra 4 dollars (with free shipping) was an acceptable price bump over spending time going to different stores and checking. I could have checked online for their availability, some sites offer this, but that feature is sometimes not accurate, as the item may have sold before the website could update, or perhaps the store has the item but the item itself is not in the precise area it should be, and thus the employee is unable to locate it. This has happened to me a few times with dolls and other items.
Recently, I have had the opportunity to buy 2 dolls that I have considered buying for a while. These are the Sorcha collector's Barbie as well as a Silkstone Barbie. They were available at my local Tuesday Morning store at decently discounted prices. I chose not to purchase either, however. Sorcha doll is on a ModelMuse body with articulated arms, but her legs do not bend at the knee. I do not like dolls that are partially articulated; it does not make sense to me to not have the whole doll articulated or non-articulated. I have featured a doll before, the Harley Davidson Barbie from the Harley Davidson Ken and Barbie set, and she was articulated only at the knee, with both arms straight out. This annoyed me, especially as Harley Davidson Ken had full-body articulation. I did not buy the set to obtain her specifically, however, (rather I bought it for the Ken) so it was a mild annoyance only, though I would have loved her had she been fully articulated. I suppose I could buy Sorcha and combine the Harley Davidson Barbie with her, giving me one fully articulated body and one non-articulated body, but I do not have the expertise to modify the Barbie bodies with any confidence. I apologise if I am rambling on, I tend to do so when I have had too much tea, and I certainly had too much tea today. The second doll I declined was the African American Silkstone in a blue jacket and skirt outfit, I do not know the name offhand. This is one of the newly articulated Silkstone dolls, which I have lukewarm feelings about - I love articulated bodies, but the Silkstone doll is much nicer, and just does not look good with the articulation, it cheapens the look. That is not the reason I declined, however. I did not like the quality of the material, and the stitching was very wide, as in not spaced closely with wide gaps, and unattractive. The clothing looked very cheap and almost home-made. For what is supposed to be a higher-quality doll, I was not impressed. I know many collectors of the higher-quality collector Barbies have been very unsatisfied with the quality of the dolls that have been released, it seems that Mattel consistently lowers the quality of the nicer dolls as time goes on. I see this myself, but I love the fashionistas line, I am very impressed with the wide array of individuality. I love the diverse faces, skin tones, and features, and almost every single doll's fashions have interested me. I have been unable to buy as many as I wish, as I would really rather not have a huge number of dolls. But I have bought several that I couldn't help myself from liking. I wish I could say that this trend carried over to Mattel's other brand, Monster High, as well as Ever After High. I believe Mattel has phased out Ever After and no longer makes them, and it seems that Mattel is phasing out Monster High, as well. I am thoroughly unhappy with this, as I adored Monster High and Ever After High. Now it seems that the only Monster High dolls you can buy are the cheap, ugly ones that have the shoes molded on to the legs, no articulation, and the shirts/tops are only molded on as well, with the cheapest and plainest skirts being the only fabric on the doll. They have softened the faces, as well, which I am ambivalent about, as I understand change is typically required to ensure continued customer interest. I don't mind them, but I am saddened by the loss of what Monster High was before. I loved the highly-detailed outfits. I especially dislike losing the Ever After High line, as I had only just discovered their existence shortly before Ever After started disappearing from the shelves. In fact, one of the Ever After dolls is one of the dolls that I have purchased this week. I discovered the existence of the character Mira Shards only 2 days ago, and loved what I saw. She was in the 'darker' character lineup like Raven Queen, my favorite Ever After character. I immediately went to ebay and discovered only one of them, and bought it. Here is her stock photo:
I have not followed the Monster High film collection, so I don't know anything about the characters themselves outside of what they have on their boxes. It seems that there is only one edition of Mira Shards available, from the 'Dragon Games' theme. From what I have read, there is only one appearance of Mira Shards in the Monster High storyline. It's a shame, as there are lots of fashion possibilities for this character.
I understand that nothing is forever, but I thought that Monster High would be around for longer. It seems just last year that I was reading how MH sales were higher than Barbie sales. So to see such a sudden cessation to them really disappoints me. The creativity was very high with those dolls, and I feel that kids (and collectors alike) could use much more creative thinking/playing with these dolls, as there were more possibilities than with Barbie, who, being human, has fewer possible 'realistic-to-the-toy-theme' options. A random example of what I mean is, it would fall in line for a Monster High doll's bed to be filled with toxic glowing goo. One could do that with Barbie, of course, and I certainly did things like that, but the Barbie character is more humanistic in her 'life', preferring pink or purple pillows to pink or purple slime. Anyway, I digress. My opinions mean nothing to everyone but myself, I'm simply rambling. I will close this entry, and write further entries about my other new dolls. I hope I have not ended this entry badly!
I love his shoes, I did not see them until I received him today. I tend to not look at dolls online for very long because I typically like but do not buy them, as there are others higher on my list. I usually only buy one or two dolls a month, I do my best to limit myself. At the rate I buy dolls, many of those that I like but choose my monthly one or two over get pushed back down on the list, due to my liking another doll more at the time, and sometimes are not available in the stores by the time they reach the top of my list again. This is what happened with Ken Fashionistas Hyped Stripes. I did not check all of the stores in my city before buying him, just 3 or 4, but I felt paying an extra 4 dollars (with free shipping) was an acceptable price bump over spending time going to different stores and checking. I could have checked online for their availability, some sites offer this, but that feature is sometimes not accurate, as the item may have sold before the website could update, or perhaps the store has the item but the item itself is not in the precise area it should be, and thus the employee is unable to locate it. This has happened to me a few times with dolls and other items.
Recently, I have had the opportunity to buy 2 dolls that I have considered buying for a while. These are the Sorcha collector's Barbie as well as a Silkstone Barbie. They were available at my local Tuesday Morning store at decently discounted prices. I chose not to purchase either, however. Sorcha doll is on a ModelMuse body with articulated arms, but her legs do not bend at the knee. I do not like dolls that are partially articulated; it does not make sense to me to not have the whole doll articulated or non-articulated. I have featured a doll before, the Harley Davidson Barbie from the Harley Davidson Ken and Barbie set, and she was articulated only at the knee, with both arms straight out. This annoyed me, especially as Harley Davidson Ken had full-body articulation. I did not buy the set to obtain her specifically, however, (rather I bought it for the Ken) so it was a mild annoyance only, though I would have loved her had she been fully articulated. I suppose I could buy Sorcha and combine the Harley Davidson Barbie with her, giving me one fully articulated body and one non-articulated body, but I do not have the expertise to modify the Barbie bodies with any confidence. I apologise if I am rambling on, I tend to do so when I have had too much tea, and I certainly had too much tea today. The second doll I declined was the African American Silkstone in a blue jacket and skirt outfit, I do not know the name offhand. This is one of the newly articulated Silkstone dolls, which I have lukewarm feelings about - I love articulated bodies, but the Silkstone doll is much nicer, and just does not look good with the articulation, it cheapens the look. That is not the reason I declined, however. I did not like the quality of the material, and the stitching was very wide, as in not spaced closely with wide gaps, and unattractive. The clothing looked very cheap and almost home-made. For what is supposed to be a higher-quality doll, I was not impressed. I know many collectors of the higher-quality collector Barbies have been very unsatisfied with the quality of the dolls that have been released, it seems that Mattel consistently lowers the quality of the nicer dolls as time goes on. I see this myself, but I love the fashionistas line, I am very impressed with the wide array of individuality. I love the diverse faces, skin tones, and features, and almost every single doll's fashions have interested me. I have been unable to buy as many as I wish, as I would really rather not have a huge number of dolls. But I have bought several that I couldn't help myself from liking. I wish I could say that this trend carried over to Mattel's other brand, Monster High, as well as Ever After High. I believe Mattel has phased out Ever After and no longer makes them, and it seems that Mattel is phasing out Monster High, as well. I am thoroughly unhappy with this, as I adored Monster High and Ever After High. Now it seems that the only Monster High dolls you can buy are the cheap, ugly ones that have the shoes molded on to the legs, no articulation, and the shirts/tops are only molded on as well, with the cheapest and plainest skirts being the only fabric on the doll. They have softened the faces, as well, which I am ambivalent about, as I understand change is typically required to ensure continued customer interest. I don't mind them, but I am saddened by the loss of what Monster High was before. I loved the highly-detailed outfits. I especially dislike losing the Ever After High line, as I had only just discovered their existence shortly before Ever After started disappearing from the shelves. In fact, one of the Ever After dolls is one of the dolls that I have purchased this week. I discovered the existence of the character Mira Shards only 2 days ago, and loved what I saw. She was in the 'darker' character lineup like Raven Queen, my favorite Ever After character. I immediately went to ebay and discovered only one of them, and bought it. Here is her stock photo:
I have not followed the Monster High film collection, so I don't know anything about the characters themselves outside of what they have on their boxes. It seems that there is only one edition of Mira Shards available, from the 'Dragon Games' theme. From what I have read, there is only one appearance of Mira Shards in the Monster High storyline. It's a shame, as there are lots of fashion possibilities for this character.
I understand that nothing is forever, but I thought that Monster High would be around for longer. It seems just last year that I was reading how MH sales were higher than Barbie sales. So to see such a sudden cessation to them really disappoints me. The creativity was very high with those dolls, and I feel that kids (and collectors alike) could use much more creative thinking/playing with these dolls, as there were more possibilities than with Barbie, who, being human, has fewer possible 'realistic-to-the-toy-theme' options. A random example of what I mean is, it would fall in line for a Monster High doll's bed to be filled with toxic glowing goo. One could do that with Barbie, of course, and I certainly did things like that, but the Barbie character is more humanistic in her 'life', preferring pink or purple pillows to pink or purple slime. Anyway, I digress. My opinions mean nothing to everyone but myself, I'm simply rambling. I will close this entry, and write further entries about my other new dolls. I hope I have not ended this entry badly!
Monday, July 23, 2018
Sydney Opera House Barbie
Recently, the Barbie Collector website placed the Sydney Opera House Barbie Doll on sale. I had almost bought this doll from Tuesday Morning several years ago, and was able to buy her now. I liked the use of the colors (which were pulled from the colors of the Sydney Opera House itself) and the fun hairstyle. The purse is awesome, too!
As barbiecollector.com describes her: "The Sydney Opera House Barbie® doll looks breathtakingly beautiful in a dress inspired by the architecture of the Opera House combined with a fashionable twist. The sails of Sydney Opera House inspire Barbie® doll’s bodice while the water surrounding the building is displayed in a luxe, ocean-blue chiffon. With a clutch inspired by the Sydney Opera House sails and the Sydney harbor breeze blowing in her hair, this Barbie® doll is a true Australian beauty."
Here are the stock photos of the Sydney Opera House Barbie® Doll:
As barbiecollector.com describes her: "The Sydney Opera House Barbie® doll looks breathtakingly beautiful in a dress inspired by the architecture of the Opera House combined with a fashionable twist. The sails of Sydney Opera House inspire Barbie® doll’s bodice while the water surrounding the building is displayed in a luxe, ocean-blue chiffon. With a clutch inspired by the Sydney Opera House sails and the Sydney harbor breeze blowing in her hair, this Barbie® doll is a true Australian beauty."
Here are the stock photos of the Sydney Opera House Barbie® Doll:
Thursday, April 12, 2018
Hello Barbie
I recently won a new Hello Barbie online, and I really like her. I saw pictures of her when she was still in development some years ago, and fell in love with her outfit. I originally planned to buy her only for her outfit to put on other dolls, but I have come to really like her as a whole doll. She is quite pretty. I love her hairstyle.
From Barbie: "Now, you can chat with Barbie! Using WiFi and speech recognition technology, Hello Barbie doll can interact uniquely with each child by holding conversations, playing games, sharing stories and even telling jokes! It's a whole new way to interact with Barbie. She's ready to discuss anything in an outfit that blends trendy and techie for a cool look. Use is simple after set up-push the doll's belt buckle to start a conversation, and release to hear her respond. More than 8,000 lines of recorded content means countless hours of fun! Just like a real friend, Hello Barbie doll listens and remembers the user's likes and dislikes, giving everyone their own unique experience."
Hello Barbie came in the three standard skin tones:
I haven't tried setting up Hello Barbie for her intended purpose, I don't know that I will. I am sure I will get around to trying it out, eventually, but I just like her for her looks, not what's inside (hahaha).
Speaking of what's inside, here is a disassembled Hello Barbie:
There has been talk of Hello Barbie since her development, and the discussion ranges from great to bad (the worst thing I've seen about her online is quite hilarious - one person called her "The Illuminati Spy Doll"). I will not discuss this topic here, as there are plenty of other sites that have hosted this ridiculous conversation, and I do not feel that I have anything to add to it other than criticism. I will state that it seems that most of the talking is done by people who are not fully informed about the doll.
I think she's great either as she is intended to be used or just for a play toy.
From Barbie: "Now, you can chat with Barbie! Using WiFi and speech recognition technology, Hello Barbie doll can interact uniquely with each child by holding conversations, playing games, sharing stories and even telling jokes! It's a whole new way to interact with Barbie. She's ready to discuss anything in an outfit that blends trendy and techie for a cool look. Use is simple after set up-push the doll's belt buckle to start a conversation, and release to hear her respond. More than 8,000 lines of recorded content means countless hours of fun! Just like a real friend, Hello Barbie doll listens and remembers the user's likes and dislikes, giving everyone their own unique experience."
Hello Barbie came in the three standard skin tones:
I haven't tried setting up Hello Barbie for her intended purpose, I don't know that I will. I am sure I will get around to trying it out, eventually, but I just like her for her looks, not what's inside (hahaha).
Speaking of what's inside, here is a disassembled Hello Barbie:
There has been talk of Hello Barbie since her development, and the discussion ranges from great to bad (the worst thing I've seen about her online is quite hilarious - one person called her "The Illuminati Spy Doll"). I will not discuss this topic here, as there are plenty of other sites that have hosted this ridiculous conversation, and I do not feel that I have anything to add to it other than criticism. I will state that it seems that most of the talking is done by people who are not fully informed about the doll.
I think she's great either as she is intended to be used or just for a play toy.
Tuesday, March 6, 2018
Andy Warhol Barbie Doll/Andy Warhol Campbell's Soup Can 1 Doll
I bought the Andy Warhol Barbie wearing the Campbell's Soup Can 1 outfit a few days ago. I wanted to share her here for you :) I bought her for her body only, which I will use with another Barbie head. I am not a fan of Warhol, and I do not like this Barbie's eyes. I will find a new home for the head. But I took some photos to feature here.
This doll was released in 2015/2016, so she is not 'new' on the scene. From the Barbie site: Barbie® is the perfect complement to Andy Warhol—two fabulously unforgettable icons! The second doll produced in collaboration with The Andy Warhol Foundation draws its inspiration from the seminal Campbell’s Soup series. Styled with serious attitude, Barbie wears an oversized tee emblazoned with the tomato soup can, faux-fur coat, black leggings, and calf-high white faux-leather boots.
Designer: Linda Kyaw
My Warhol:
The boots are different, they have white bottoms, not black like in the photos online. They are ugly in person, and I will not keep them as I had thought I would.
There are a few comments online criticizing this doll for seeming to not give due credit that it is inspired by Edie Sedgewick, with the eye makeup and chandelier earrings. Do you see a resemblance?
I will keep the leggings, probably the jacket as well. For a Warhol fan, this doll is likely a must-have. I am not very interested in pop art. The articulated pivotal ModelMuse body is why I bought this doll, it is in a light skin tone that is a little harder to get, for me at least. I wish Mattel would sell the bodies separately. I am terribly disappointed with the fingernails. In the photos from the website, they look long and pretty. I was excited to have this body with lovely nails. In person, the hands are the same hands as the other ModelMuse hands, with short/nonexistent nails, and they have been painted poorly as well, which is an issue I've had with them in the past (such as with Sweet Tea). The paint that they do have isn't even on the nail, which is sculpted and harder to see in the photos.
Overall, I don't think this is worth the $45 I paid for it. I don't think most of what Mattel has been releasing is worth the price they ask. It seems that most collectors of the brand share the same view. No wonder Mattel is having a hard time financially.
This doll was released in 2015/2016, so she is not 'new' on the scene. From the Barbie site: Barbie® is the perfect complement to Andy Warhol—two fabulously unforgettable icons! The second doll produced in collaboration with The Andy Warhol Foundation draws its inspiration from the seminal Campbell’s Soup series. Styled with serious attitude, Barbie wears an oversized tee emblazoned with the tomato soup can, faux-fur coat, black leggings, and calf-high white faux-leather boots.
Designer: Linda Kyaw
My Warhol:
The boots are different, they have white bottoms, not black like in the photos online. They are ugly in person, and I will not keep them as I had thought I would.
There are a few comments online criticizing this doll for seeming to not give due credit that it is inspired by Edie Sedgewick, with the eye makeup and chandelier earrings. Do you see a resemblance?
I will keep the leggings, probably the jacket as well. For a Warhol fan, this doll is likely a must-have. I am not very interested in pop art. The articulated pivotal ModelMuse body is why I bought this doll, it is in a light skin tone that is a little harder to get, for me at least. I wish Mattel would sell the bodies separately. I am terribly disappointed with the fingernails. In the photos from the website, they look long and pretty. I was excited to have this body with lovely nails. In person, the hands are the same hands as the other ModelMuse hands, with short/nonexistent nails, and they have been painted poorly as well, which is an issue I've had with them in the past (such as with Sweet Tea). The paint that they do have isn't even on the nail, which is sculpted and harder to see in the photos.
Overall, I don't think this is worth the $45 I paid for it. I don't think most of what Mattel has been releasing is worth the price they ask. It seems that most collectors of the brand share the same view. No wonder Mattel is having a hard time financially.
Tuesday, November 14, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







































